-
Story
-
Resolution: Done
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
BU Product Work
-
13
-
False
-
None
-
False
-
OCPSTRAT-416 - Gateway API using Istio for Cluster Ingress (Dev Preview)
-
Sprint 230, Sprint 231, Sprint 232
-
0
-
0.000
Depends on the operator we choose, see NE-1105. Worst case is if we need a new operator and couldn't re-use anything in Ingress or Istio.
Enhancement proposal may be necessary.
How do we know when to create the record?
Open Questions
- Where does the cluster admin configure the domain for the operator to use in the DNS record?
- GatewayClass? Probably not; this is for implementation-specific things (e.g. Istio-specific things), and we have OpenShift CRDs for vendor-specific (e.g. Red Hat-specific) things.
- ingresses.config.openshift.io/cluster?
- Some new OpenShift-specific cluster config CRD?
Acceptance Criteria: DNS Management can be provided for Gateway API xRoutes and components, either with changes to Ingress Operator, a new operator that works in the absence of Ingress Operator, or both.
[Stretch Goal]: Provide E2E testing of the new DNS logic support with Gateway API