-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
RH442 - RHEL 8 1 20190828
-
None
-
7
-
ROLE
-
en-US (English)
URL: https://rol.redhat.com/rol/app/courses/rh442-8.0/pages/ch07
Reporter RHNID: ctiwary@redhat.com
Section: Dynamic priority - Tuning CPU Utilization
Language: en-US (English)|
Workaround:
Description: chapter 7 Tuning CPU utilization the last lines of text under** Dynamic Priority.**
It states that a process with nice value of 10 will get more CPU time than a process with nice value of 5.
Isn't is the other way around? The process with nice value of 5 gets more CPU time than the process with a nice value of 10? Since the lower the nice value the higher the priority.
- is duplicated by
-
PTL-13670 User Feedback -- Phrase "For example, under system CPU saturation, a process with nice value of 10 would get twice the CPU time of a process with nice value of 5." doesn't look correct.
- Review
- relates to
-
PTL-12990 Discussion of process priority in ch07s01 is suspect
- Backlog