-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Minor
-
RH442 - RHEL 8 1 20190828
-
None
-
False
-
-
False
-
7
-
ROLE
-
-
-
en-US (English)
Please fill in the following information:
URL: | https://rol.redhat.com/rol/app/courses/rh442-8.0/pages/ch07 |
Reporter RHNID: | yuvaraj-rhls |
Section Title: | Configuring CPU Scheduling Policies and Tunables |
Issue description
Description: Phrase "For example, under system CPU saturation, a process with nice value of 10 would get twice the CPU time of a process with nice value of 5." doesn't look correct.
According source code of 4.18 linux kernel - nice effect is different. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18/source/kernel/sched/core.c#L7060
Please double check.
Steps to reproduce:
Workaround:
Expected result:
- duplicates
-
PTL-8201 RH442-151: ch07: Isn't is the other way around? The process with nice value of 5 gets more CPU time than the process with a nice value of 10? Since the lower the nice value the higher the priority.
- Closed