Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

Type: Epic
Resolution: Obsolete
Priority: Critical
Fix Version/s: openshift-4.19
Affects Version/s: None
Labels:
- 4.19-candidate
- gateway-api

Epic Name:
Cooexist with an existing OpenShift service-mesh control plane
Work Type:
BU Product Work
Blocked:
False
Blocked Reason:
None
Ready:
False
Color Status:
Green
Epic Status:
To Do
Feature Link:
OCPSTRAT-134 - Gateway API using Istio for Cluster Ingress - GA
Parent Link:
OCPSTRAT-134Gateway API using Istio for Cluster Ingress - GA
Hierarchy Progress Bar:

0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
Size:
L

WSJF:
0

SFDC Cases Links:
SFDC Cases Open:
SFDC Cases Counter:

Intelligence Requested:
Market:

We need to develop tests that verify which (if any) OSSM functionality may be impeded or affected by another OSSM that exists on the cluster, for any combination of deployable coexisting OSSM versions.

Additional Notes

Ideally this is a no-op: do we already have this testing?
Document this in the EP: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1303 in the open question section pertaining to this question.

blocks

NE-1095 [GWAPI-TP] Provide a solution for a Unified Control Plane

Closed

is related to

NE-1915 Document how we have configured Istio

Closed

OSSM-8825 Write e2e test covering Gateway API instance & mesh instance

Closed

NE-1290 Define the options list and API to configure the SMCP created by cluster ingress operator

Closed

NE-999 Understand Istio operator interactions with Istio Gateway

Closed

Assignee:: Andrey Lebedev

Reporter:: Candace Holman

QA Contact:: Ishmam Amin

Votes:: 1 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 6 Start watching this issue

Created:: 2023/01/26 9:22 PM

Updated:: 2025/05/06 9:47 PM

Resolved:: 2025/05/06 9:46 PM

Details

Description

Additional Notes

Attachments

Issue Links

Easy Agile Planning Poker

Activity

People

Dates