Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift SDN'
  1. OpenShift SDN
  2. SDN-5314

Universal connectivity: Routable secondary L2 overlay without IPAM

XMLWordPrintable

    • udn-secondary-l2-overlay
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • ---
    • 0
    • 0

      Template:

      Networking Definition of Planned

      Epic Template descriptions and documentation

      Epic Goal

      Allow import of VMs connected to an overlay network.

      Why is this important?

      Sometimes, VMs migrated to OpenShift Virtualization are using static IP allocation. This allocation is done by the guest itself, i.e. there is no centralized IPAM.

      We are seeing increased interest in SDN for VMs, and while primary UDN provides lot of the needed functionality, for our typical VMs it may provide too much. The fact that primary UDN handles IP address assignment prevents users from preserving their statically allocated IPs they used on their previous virtualization platform.

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.
      • Secondary L2 overlay networks can be created using (Cluster)UserDefined networks. A new attribute opts-out from OVN Kubernetes IPAM.
      • These UDNs are assigned with a subnet and default GW IP.
      • These UDNs provide NAT'd egress
      • These UDNs allow routed ingress (since we don't know which IPs are used by individual enpoints in the network, we don't plan to support Services). This would be the same BGP-based advertisement as for the primary UDN
      • IPs are not assigned by OVN Kubernetes, IP spoof filtering is disabled\

       

      Non-goals

      • We do not expect selector-based MultiNetworkPolicies or Services to work, since OVN Kubernetes has no awareness of the assigned IPs, and that's fine.

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1. BGP ingress working on primary UDN

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. SDN-4919
      2. CNV-17002 

      Open questions::

      1. ...

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              sseethar Surya Seetharaman
              phoracek@redhat.com Petr Horacek
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: