Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Specialist Platform Team'
  1. OpenShift Specialist Platform Team
  2. SPLAT-959

[aws][local-zones] Increase the coverage of locations on CI

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • None

      (description in progress)

      {}USER STORY:{}

      As a Developer, I want to increase the coverage of the Local Zones location on CI, so I can make sure we are testing a different location every time the CI is running.

       

      {}DESCRIPTION:{}

      Currently the e2e is provisioning the cluster, adding the Local Zone location based on the subnet's zone (parent zone), fixed value.[1]

      We could increase the coverage by getting ramdomly the zoneName when listing the zones, something like

      $ aws --region us-east-1 ec2 describe-availability-zones --filters Name=opt-in-status,Values=opted-in Name=zone-type,Values=local-zone |jq -r .AvailabilityZones[].ZoneName | shuf |head -n1
      us-east-1-scl-1a
      
      $ aws --region us-east-1 ec2 describe-availability-zones --filters Name=opt-in-status,Values=opted-in Name=zone-type,Values=local-zone |jq -r .AvailabilityZones[].ZoneName | shuf |head -n1
      us-east-1-bos-1a
      
      (...) 

      So for each execution we could get a different zone to provision the cluster, running e2e on that zone.

      Over the time we may have a good coverage on the given region.

       

      {}Required:{}

      ...

      {}Nice to have:{}

      ...

      {}ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:{}

      TBD

      {}ENGINEERING DETAILS:{}

      [1] https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/aws/provision/localzone-subnet/aws-provision-localzone-subnet-commands.sh#L116-L125

       

       

       

       

              rhn-support-mrbraga Marco Braga
              rhn-support-mrbraga Marco Braga
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: