-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Platform
-
False
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description of problem:
Docs don't explain that users can't use SHA-1 certificates with Satellite. The installer displays an error when a SHA-1 certificate is used but users should be aware of the requirement before they run the installer.
SHA-1 is not supported on the RHEL 9 side either.
How reproducible:
Is this issue a regression from an earlier version:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual behavior:
4.11. Configuring Satellite Server with a custom SSL certificate lists lists prerequisites/requirements for the scenario of configuring a server with a custom SSL certificate, but it doesn't mention SHA-1.
I didn't find any relevant occurrences anywhere else in the docs set either.
Expected behavior:
4.11. Configuring Satellite Server with a custom SSL certificate lists should explain that SHA-1 certs are not supported because they are considered insecure.
It wouldn't hurt to take a closer look at how the section is structured in general and make some improvements so that the new requirement related to SHA-1 isn't easy to overlook.
We might want to make a similar update somewhere in the Upgrade guide too.
Business Impact / Additional info:
EDIT: It turns out we have this documented as a known issue in Release Notes: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_satellite/6.16/html-single/release_notes/index#known-issues-security-and-authentication A prerequisite in the product guides, as described above, is still a good idea.
- is related to
-
SAT-32621 Some users are blocked from upgrading to Satellite 6.16 since they cannot get a non-sha1 custom certificate
-
- New
-