Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Internal Developer Platform'
  1. Red Hat Internal Developer Platform
  2. RHIDP-12363

Correct status of community plugins (azure, servicenow, http-request scaffolder plugins)

    • Correct status of community plugins (azure, servicenow, http-request scaffolder plugins)
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • RHDHPLAN-906[Doc] Announce downgrade to Community support for 5 plugins in a future release
    • In Progress
    • RHDHPLAN-906 - [Doc] Announce downgrade to Community support for 5 plugins in a future release
    • QE Needed, Docs Needed, TE Needed, Customer Facing, PX Needed
    • 57% To Do, 14% In Progress, 29% Done
    • Important

      EPIC Goal

      What are we trying to solve here?

      1.9 docs incorrectly lists the following as community plugins falling under the scope of TP support:

      @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-azure
      	
      @roadiehq/scaffolder-backend-module-http-request
      	
      @backstage-community/plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-servicenow
      

      Background/Feature Origin

      As discussed in group DM with PM and docs, only azure and service now are community supported while http-request is GA supported

      Why is this important?

      User Scenarios

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      Acceptance Criteria

      Release Enablement/Demo - Provide necessary release enablement details
      and documents

      DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
      Issue>

      DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
      Issue>

      DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>

      QE - Test plans in Playwright: <link or reference to playwright>

      QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>

      DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              ktsao@redhat.com Kim Tsao
              ktsao@redhat.com Kim Tsao
              RHDH Security
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: