-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
6.x.x
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
CR1
-
+
-
2019 Week 05-07, 2019 Week 08-10, 2019 Week 11-13
Imagine data model Person with attribute age.
If you create decision table and add two columns:
- both are defined against "age" attribute
- none of them have operator defined
then you add one row, and you fill in the operator and the value directly inside the row.
For example:
>= 20
<= 30
The generated DRL looks like this:
package org; //from row number: 1 rule "Row 1 AnotherTest" dialect "mvel" when p : Person( age >= 20 , age <= 30 ) then p.setAgeGroup( "whatever" ); end
The V&V will report this as conflicting row:
- clones
-
DROOLS-1797 Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
- Closed
- is cloned by
-
DROOLS-3283 Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
- Closed