-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Critical
-
None
-
7.14.0.Final
-
None
-
2018 Week 45-47, 2018 Week 48-50, 2019 Week 02-04, 2018 Week 51-01
-
NEW
-
NEW
Imagine data model Person with attribute age.
If you create decision table and add two columns:
- both are defined against "age" attribute
- none of them have operator defined
then you add one row, and you fill in the operator and the value directly inside the row.
For example:
>= 20
<= 30
The generated DRL looks like this:
package org; //from row number: 1 rule "Row 1 AnotherTest" dialect "mvel" when p : Person( age >= 20 , age <= 30 ) then p.setAgeGroup( "whatever" ); end
The V&V will report this as conflicting row:
- clones
-
RHDM-711 Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
- Closed
- is duplicated by
-
DROOLS-1797 Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
- Closed