Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Request For Enhancement'
  1. OpenShift Request For Enhancement
  2. RFE-4664

CMA Operator allows the user of arbitrary namespace name

XMLWordPrintable

    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected

      1. Proposed title of this feature request
      CMA Operator allows the user of arbitrary namespace name

      2. What is the nature and description of the request?
      With ROSA/OSD, privileged namespaces are blocked by webhook.  The list is (as of right now in 'master' branch):
      https://github.com/openshift/managed-cluster-validating-webhooks/blob/master/pkg/config/namespaces.go#L11-L120

      And is documented here: https://docs.openshift.com/rosa/sd_support/rosa-managed-resources.html#rosa-managed-resources-all

      From a managed-services/service-delivery perspective there is a strong preference to not rely on a specific namespace for installation, instead support running in any namespace, so that customer has flexibility on how an operator is deployed.

      This RFE is to gain the ability with the CMA operator to run it in a cluster in a custom named namespace, instead of only "openshift-*" namespaces.

      3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

      See prior. We have numerous customers eager to use CMA with ROSA/OSD but given the above limitation, we will need this capability.

      4. List any affected packages or components.

      Unknown

              gausingh@redhat.com Gaurav Singh
              rh-ee-adejong Aaren de Jong
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: