-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Minor
-
RH124 - RHEL9.0-en-5-20230516, RH124 - RHEL9.0-en-4-20230227
-
12
-
ROLE
-
en-US (English)
URL: https://rol.redhat.com/rol/app/courses/rh124-9.0/pages/ch12
Reporter RHNID: ctiwary@redhat.com
Section: - Chapter 12. Manage Networking
Language: en-US (English)|
Workaround:
Description: ch12: At the beginning of the chapter it is said that RHEL no longer uses the ethX NIC naming scheme but following example used the same old one.
I see that there are two JIRAs discussing about the same issue : https://training-feedback.redhat.com/browse/RH124-725 && https://training-feedback.redhat.com/browse/RH124-839 . However the confusion is still there because of the mentioned thing in ch12 intro lecture.
When we are declaring old scheme to be error prone and ;This new naming scheme is designed to address the problem of unpredictable and inconsistent network interface names that could occur with the old naming scheme, particularly in systems with multiple network interfaces. The new scheme provides a more consistent and predictable naming convention that makes it easier to identify and manage network interfaces ; then why are we using the old scheme in the same chapter ?
- relates to
-
PTL-2560 RH124-725: RHT1783971 - incorrect ethernet interface name in the guide
- Closed
-
PTL-2890 RH124-839: RHT1758786 - ip link command shows eth0 instead of ensX
- Closed
-
PTL-11886 RH199: ch13s09 - interface "enX" is confusing- RHT2094409
- Closed
-
PTL-12128 VMs in RHCSA courses still using old ethX network naming.
- Closed