-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
DO370 - ODF4.16-en-3-20251212
-
None
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
-
en-US (English)
Please fill in the following information:
| URL: | https://role.rhu.redhat.com/rol-rhu/app/courses/do370-4.16/pages/ch02 |
| Reporter RHNID: | hemoller |
| Section Title: | OpenShift Data Foundation Storage Classes |
Issue description
Internal User Feedback
===================
Description: ch02s03 -> File storage
In the case I just created, I pointed out that FS is not a good fit for backup and archive, because it's loads of data that is much better served by S3.
2 paragraphs further down, I read this:
"... One particular pitfall of file storage is the poor handling of large data sets or unstructured data. For example, Hadoop workloads, which include large sets of unstructured data, are not a good candidate for using file storage solutions."
That just confirms my previous ticket... Backup and archival should be in included in the above sentence.
Steps to reproduce:
Workaround:
Expected result: