Uploaded image for project: 'Product Technical Learning'
  1. Product Technical Learning
  2. PTL-12916

RHT2120699: RH442: Ch05s05: There is some inconsistency when it comes to the syntax of "CPUAccounting".

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • RH442 - RHEL8.0-en-2-20251006
    • RH442 - RHEL8.0-en-1-20190828
    • RH442
    • None
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • 5
    • en-US (English)

      Please fill in the following information:

      URL: https://rol.redhat.com/rol/app/courses/rh442-8.0/pages/ch05s05
      Reporter RHNID: wasim-rhls
      Section Title:             Lab: Managing Resource Limits with Control Groups
                                                                 

      Issue description

      There is some inconsistency when it comes to the syntax of "CPUAccounting". Initially its mentioned that enabling CPU,Memory,BlockIO accounting can be done by declaring "CPUAccounting=true" Later on, as part of the guided exercise & lab review the "true" is changed for "yes" - of course both are working fine Finally, as part of the lab review if the workers.slice is set to "CPUAccounting=true" the grading script marks it as Fail. Additionally the tasks "Checking for web/dbase service conf file" is looking explicitly for a file 10-limits.conf but the use of such filename is not stated. 

      Steps to reproduce:

       

      Workaround:

       

      Expected result:

              rhn-support-sdhange Shreya Dhange
              wraja@redhat.com Wasim Raja
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: