Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-25141

AdminPolicyBasedExternalRoute status.Status is not updated

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • 4.15.0
    • None
    • No
    • Proposed
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

      This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-24650. The following is the description of the original issue:

      Description of problem:

      https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-22710?focusedId=23594559&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-23594559

       
      seems the issue still here, test on 4.15.0-0.nightly-2023-12-04-223539, there is status.message for each zone, but there is no summarized status, so move to Assigned.
      apbexternalroute yaml file is:

      apiVersion: k8s.ovn.org/v1
      kind: AdminPolicyBasedExternalRoute
      metadata:
        name: default-route-policy
      spec:
        from:
          namespaceSelector:
            matchLabels:
              kubernetes.io/metadata.name: test
        nextHops:
          static:
          - ip: "172.18.0.8"
          - ip: "172.18.0.9" 

      and Status section as below:

      % oc get apbexternalroute
      NAME                   LAST UPDATE   STATUS
      default-route-policy   12s <--- still empty
      % oc describe apbexternalroute default-route-policy | tail -n 10
      Status:
      Last Transition Time: 2023-12-06T02:12:11Z
      Messages:
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-master-2.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-master-0.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-worker-a-55fzx.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-master-1.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-worker-b-m98ms.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      qiowang-120620-gtt85-worker-c-vtl8q.c.openshift-qe.internal: configured external gateway IPs: 172.18.0.8,172.18.0.9
      Events: <none> 

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

       

      How reproducible:

       

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1.

      2.

      3.

       

      Actual results:

       

      Expected results:

       

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure 
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

       

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

       

      If it is a CI failure:

       

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

       

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

       

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Please provide must-gather and sos-report with an exact link to the comment in the support case with the attachment.  The format should be: https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/<case number>/discussion?attachmentId=<attachment id>
      • Describe what each attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).  
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and  dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, labels with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”

              npinaeva@redhat.com Nadia Pinaeva
              openshift-crt-jira-prow OpenShift Prow Bot
              Anurag Saxena Anurag Saxena
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: