-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Critical
-
None
-
4.9.z
-
None
-
Quality / Stability / Reliability
-
False
-
-
None
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description of problem:
CU is seeing a size difference in the etcd members. So he is more concerned about this offset. They want to know if it impacted the etcd if the leader move to lesser size etcd member due to any reason because the size of the db's are having 100 MB difference.
Every 2.0s: etcdctl endpoint status --cluster -w table
---------------------------{}--------------{}+{}-----{}{}-----{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}----------------{}{}------
| ENDPOINT | ID | VERSION | DB SIZE | IS LEADER | IS LEARNER | RAFT TERM | RAFT INDEX | RAFT APPLIED INDEX | ERRORS |
---------------------------{}--------------{}+{}-----{}{}-----{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}----------------{}{}------
https://10.1xx.xx.xx:2379
| 52f42eaf875f234f | 3.5.3 | 237 MB | false | false | 89 | 717068860 | 717068860 |
| ccd33edbdce9dee2 | 3.5.3 | 337 MB | false | false | 89 | 717068860 | 717068860 |
| f57e2fe42d0a3e80 | 3.5.3 | 234 MB | true | false | 89 | 717068860 | 717068860 |
---------------------------{}--------------{}+{}-----{}{}-----{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}-------{}{}--------{}{}----------------{}{}------
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
NA
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
- is duplicated by
-
-
- Closed
-
