Uploaded image for project: 'Machine Config Operator'
  1. Machine Config Operator
  2. MCO-812

Create proper types for the machineconfiguration object in the operator/v1 group

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • 5
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • OCPSTRAT-845 - [Tech Preview] Proper MCO State Reporting
    • 0
    • 0.000

       
      The non-upgrade related progressions will live in the operator/v1 group under the machineconfiguration object. This follows the idiomatic workflow of other operators where the top level object controls the status reporting information for deployments in the operator.

      In this operator/v1 object will live:

      • Operator-Progression
      • MCC-Progression
      • MCD-Progiression
      • bootstrap-progression
      • metrics options/update status (potentially)

      Why the change?

      It has been determined through API review that only upgrade health should live in the MachineConfigState API type.

       

              Unassigned Unassigned
              cdoern@redhat.com Charles Doern
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: