Uploaded image for project: 'JBoss Enterprise Application Platform'
  1. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
  2. JBEAP-15815

Clustering performance regression from 7.1 to 7.2

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Blocker
    • 7.2.0.GA
    • 7.2.0.GA.CR1
    • Clustering, Performance
    • None

    Description

      We observed performance degradation in Clustering performances.
      Some areas are worse.
      The values reported are the peaks observed in the average response time calculation.

      The scenarios cover very common use cases:

      • HTTP Session Replication
      • Stateful EJB Replication
      • The combination of the two (I always used this myself when I was a developer, in load balanced but not clustered setup)
      • replication on all nodes of the cluster
      • replication on a subset of the cluster nodes

      Here the details:

      scenario description 7.1 (ms) 7.2 (ms) percentage notes
      eap-7x-stress-session-dist-sync-haproxy http sessions replicated on all nodes, HaProxy load balancer 180 220 +22% degradation starts with about 3000 clients; HaProxy is used in OpenShift
      eap-7x-stress-heavyread-session-dist-sync http sessions replicated just on 2 nodes (of the total 4), prevalent read access 20 90 +350% degradation starts with about 3500 clients (images below)
      eap-7x-stress-ejbservlet-repl-sync http sessions and Stateful EJBs replicated on all nodes 425 550 +29% uniform degradation
      eap-7x-stress-session-dist-sync http sessions replicated just on 2 nodes (of the total 4) 160 300 +87% degradation starts with about 3500 clients
      eap-7x-stress-granular-dist-sync http sessions attributes replicated individually just on 2 nodes (of the total 4) 130 290 +123% degradation starts with about 3000 clients
      eap-7x-stress-granular-repl-sync http sessions attributes replicated individually on all nodes 290 400 +37% degradation starts with about 3500 clients
      eap-7x-stress-ejbremote-dist-sync Sateful EJBs replicated just on 2 nodes (of the total 4) 50 165 +230% degradation starts with about 2000 clients

      The following are the response time and throughput graphs for the three most affected scenarios:




      For the 3 most affected ones, here is a table with Infinispan versions details (bold are affected by degradation):

      scenario 7.2.0.GA.CR1 7.2.0.CD14.CR2 7.2.0.CD13.CR2 7.2.0.CD12.CR2
      eap-7x-stress-heavyread-session-dist-sync 9.3.3.Final 9.3.3.Final 9.2.5.Final 9.1.7.Final
      eap-7x-stress-ejbremote-dist-sync 9.3.3.Final 9.3.3.Final 9.2.5.Final 9.1.7.Final
      eap-7x-stress-granular-dist-sync 9.3.3.Final 9.3.3.Final 9.2.5.Final 9.1.7.Final

      Here is scenario eap-7x-stress-heavyread-session-dist-sync run with every Infinispan version since CD12 and we can see degradation starts with version 9.3.1.Final :

      Here is scenario eap-7x-stress-ejbremote-dist-sync run with every Infinispan version since CD12 and we can see degradation starts with version 9.3.1.Final :

      Here is scenario eap-7x-stress-granular-dist-sync run with every Infinispan version since CD12 and we can see degradation starts with version 9.3.1.Final :

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              pferraro@redhat.com Paul Ferraro
              tborgato@redhat.com Tommaso Borgato
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              11 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: