If following up to CNV-52176 brings us to architecture-agnostic temaplates that may miss the spec.template.architecture field because supporting multiple architecture (or use some other approach to expose the set of supported architectures), should the UI expose this field when the users instantiate a template to force scheduling on the proper architecture?

Should the architecture field allow an empty string (i.e., scheduling on any supported architecture)?

Should the architecture field (or set of supported architectures) be shown in the list of DataVolumes and Templates?
 

1.
2.
3.