-
Clarification
-
Resolution: Done
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
None
The spec currently says @Vetoed type is prevented from being considered by CDI and ProcessAnnotatedType.veto() forces the container to ignore the type. This is quite obvious for classes and interfaces. However not so clear when vetoing annotations (e.g. qualifier). I think ignoring means not being considered as qualifier (thus affects resolution). Other (rather theoretical) example is vetoing non-contextual instances - should it prevent performing dependency injection?
- relates to
-
CDI-320 Clarify whether ProcessAnnotatedType should be fired for annotations
- Closed