-
Epic
-
Resolution: Done
-
Critical
-
None
-
Pull in Hive leader election changes - Phase 2
-
False
-
False
-
To Do
-
ACM-637 - Self-managed IPI provider support
Epic Goal
- Hive is changing the way they do leader election, the process has to take a phased approach across two ACM releases. This is Epic is for phase two.
Why is this important?
https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CE3ETN3J8/p1643043469309600
Scenarios
- Ensure Hive leader election changes are merged into Hive 2.6 branch
- Ensure leader election changes are pulled into downstream ACM build
Acceptance Criteria
- CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
- Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
- ...
Dependencies (internal and external)
- ...
Previous Work (Optional):
- …
Open questions::
- …
Done Checklist
- CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
- Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
- DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
- DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
- QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
- QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
- DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>