-
Story
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Minor
-
None
-
None
Custom schedulers could have any number of additional resources necessary – configmaps, CRDs, rbac policies, etc... Users should either be able to provide these to the operator, or we should document that they are responsible for creating additional resources on their own
https://github.com/openshift/secondary-scheduler-operator/issues/9
Porting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071684 into JIRA.
Notes:
- The secondary scheduler operator needs to have a minimal RBAC set.
- The operator already needs to have an rbac rule when installing the same RBAC for a secondary scheduler plugin. For that, any such additional rbac rule needs to be managed by a third entity. I.e. user installing SSO and deploying a secondary scheduler is responsible and accountable for managing lifecycle of the rbac rule.
Scope: the delivery mechanism for the extra resources