Uploaded image for project: 'WINDUP - Red Hat Application Migration Toolkit'
  1. WINDUP - Red Hat Application Migration Toolkit
  2. WINDUP-3400

Developers Web Site - Use cases and migration paths table

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • None
    • Public website, Github, PR
    • None
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Hide
      * *Why we missed the bug?*
       ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.
       +_Additional comments:_+


       * *What is required:*
       ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.
       +_Additional comments:_+
      Show
      * *Why we missed the bug?*  ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.  +_Additional comments:_+  * *What is required:*  ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.  +_Additional comments:_+
    • ---
    • ---
    • AMM Sprint 219, AMM Sprint 223, AMM Sprint 222, AMM Sprint 224, AMM Sprint 225, AMM Sprint 228, AMM Sprint 226, AMM Sprint 227, AMM Sprint 229
    • None

      The table of of Use cases and migration paths does not reflect the MTA's capabailities with regard to OpenJDK8 and 11

      I would suggest we should have separate target columns of OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 11

      And a new source row of OpenJDK 8 immediately below the Oracle JDK row.
      For Oracle JDK row remove the tick from the OpenShift column, but have ticks in the OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 11 columns.

      For the OpenJDK 8 row have a tick only in the OpenJDK 11 column.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              pcattana Philip Cattanach
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: