Uploaded image for project: 'WINDUP - Red Hat Application Migration Toolkit'
  1. WINDUP - Red Hat Application Migration Toolkit
  2. WINDUP-3400

Developers Web Site - Use cases and migration paths table

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Icon: Major Major
    • None
    • None
    • Public website, Github, PR
    • None
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Hide
      * *Why we missed the bug?*
       ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.
       +_Additional comments:_+


       * *What is required:*
       ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.
       +_Additional comments:_+
      Show
      * *Why we missed the bug?*  ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.  +_Additional comments:_+  * *What is required:*  ** Pick to proper answer from drop-down field upper.  +_Additional comments:_+
    • ---
    • ---
    • AMM Sprint 219, AMM Sprint 223, AMM Sprint 222, AMM Sprint 224, AMM Sprint 225, AMM Sprint 228, AMM Sprint 226, AMM Sprint 227, AMM Sprint 229

      The table of of Use cases and migration paths does not reflect the MTA's capabailities with regard to OpenJDK8 and 11

      I would suggest we should have separate target columns of OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 11

      And a new source row of OpenJDK 8 immediately below the Oracle JDK row.
      For Oracle JDK row remove the tick from the OpenShift column, but have ticks in the OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 11 columns.

      For the OpenJDK 8 row have a tick only in the OpenJDK 11 column.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            pcattana Philip Cattanach
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: