Uploaded image for project: 'WildFly'
  1. WildFly
  2. WFLY-4327

when background tx-timeout rolls back the transaction, application thread should call tx.rollback instead of tx.suspend

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Major Major
    • 9.0.0.Beta1
    • None
    • EJB
    • None

      We found out that when the transaction manager "reaper" thread rolls back a transaction, it doesn't remove the transaction from a static collection. tx.suspend, which disassociates the transaction from the application thread, also doesn't remove the transaction from the static collection. As a result, the transaction leaks and all of the objects references by it (including all resources that are put there like JPA persistence contexts).

      To address this, we should change org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.endTransaction (STATUS_ROLLEDBACK case in switch statement) to call tm.rollback() instead of tm.suspend().

            smarlow1@redhat.com Scott Marlow
            smarlow1@redhat.com Scott Marlow
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: