Uploaded image for project: 'Undertow'
  1. Undertow
  2. UNDERTOW-799

Exceptions in SslConduit finally block while accessing closed buffer

XMLWordPrintable

      At load with WebSockets on SSL, we have been seeing IllegalStateException
      exceptions which we suspect are due to dirty connection closes. The
      observed stack in 1.3.23.Final is:

      [org.xnio.nio] (default I/O-15) XNIO000011: Task io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit$1@959ab9 failed with an exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException: UT000091: Buffer has already been freed
              at io.undertow.server.DefaultByteBufferPool$DefaultPooledBuffer.getBuffer(DefaultByteBufferPool.java:196)
              at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit.doUnwrap(SslConduit.java:744)
              at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit.doHandshake(SslConduit.java:603)
              at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit.access$500(SslConduit.java:63)
              at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit$SslReadReadyHandler.readReady(SslConduit.java:1029)
              at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit$1.run(SslConduit.java:225)
              at org.xnio.nio.WorkerThread.safeRun(WorkerThread.java:580)
              at org.xnio.nio.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:464)
      

      If past the this.unwrappedData = unwrappedData; call on about 753,
      the class-level unwrappedData is the same as the stack instance. After
      that point, any RuntimeException or IOException will result in a call
      to this.unwrappedData.close() via close()->closed(). As a result, this
      exception case will always call unwrappedData.getBuffer() on a closed
      PooledByteBuffer and throw the IllegalStateException. Since this is
      thrown from the finally block, it will mask the original exception.

      I've been unable to reproduce this locally, but this seems like a
      potential issue that should be fixed. I also don't see another
      case where unwrappedData is non-null and non-open.

              sdouglas1@redhat.com Stuart Douglas (Inactive)
              redhat@jitjat.com Valued Customer (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: