Uploaded image for project: 'Undertow'
  1. Undertow
  2. UNDERTOW-2256

Resource predicate presentation differs depending on how it is set up

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      There seems to be a difference in UX in 'resource' predicate render depending on how it is used.

      "path-prefix(/foo)-> { set(attribute=%U,value=${remaining}); resource(location='/home/baranowb/redhat/tmp/test-dir',allow-listing=true) }"

      resource_with_uri_alter.png
      vs 

      "path-prefix(/foo2)-> resource(location='/home/baranowb/redhat/tmp/test-dir2',allow-listing=true)"

      resource_no_uri_alter.png

      Possible source of this might be: https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/master/core/src/main/java/io/undertow/server/handlers/resource/DirectoryUtils.java#L98 ?

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          depends on

          Bug - A problem that impairs or prevents the functions of the product. UNDERTOW-2216 directory listing paths should be relative

          • Major - To be worked after higher priority work items are addressed. When the severity is high and the effort to change it is low to moderate, this term is chosen. Issues in this category likely have an existing workaround but implementation or execution may be non-trivial.
          • Closed

          Activity

            People

              dkafe Dimitris Kafetzis
              rhn-cservice-bbaranow Bartosz Baranowski
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: