Uploaded image for project: 'OCP Technical Release Team'
  1. OCP Technical Release Team
  2. TRT-945

Disruption tracking should distinguish between micro upgrades that do not update the OS

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None

      No node reboots is a dramatic difference for measuring disruption. Today these are lumped into the results for micro updates that do happen to have a CoreOS update. This means day to day, the results can skew dramatically.

      We need to distinguish if a CoreOS update and node reboot has taken place, and if so track this separately with a new field.

      It's similar to an empty FromRelease (aka e2e jobs without an upgrade), but probably different enough to track with a new flag because we do still roll all the pods images in our manifest)

      How can we determine if an OS update took place most reliably in the ci-tools code which ingests disruption results?

      Should we filter out "failed" upgrades?

              rh-ee-fbabcock Forrest Babcock
              rhn-engineering-dgoodwin Devan Goodwin
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: