-
Story
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
None
-
False
-
-
Risk analysis on https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_cluster-version-operator/889/pull-ci-openshift-cluster-version-operator-master-e2e-agnostic/1618578311938576384 shows "Unknown" because it could only identify the job as amd64 ha.
Could we just report risk based on the unscoped test results for cases like this?
Or use cluster-data.json to generate variants?
- links to
(4 links to)