https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1716812161715429?thread_ts=1716471257.668129&cid=C01CQA76KMX

Jan believes this is resulting from Kube 1.30 rebase, but the origin 1.30 PR not updated yet.

hits tests on Azure, possibly more:

[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: azure-disk] [Testpattern: Pre-provisioned PV (default fs)] volumes should store data [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: azure-disk] [Testpattern: Pre-provisioned PV (ext4)] volumes should store data [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: azure-disk] [Testpattern: Pre-provisioned PV (block volmode)] volumes should store data [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

Example: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.17-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade/1794855473254502400

And in GCP:

[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes GCEPD [Feature:StorageProvider] should test that deleting the PV before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach [Skipped:NoOptionalCapabilities] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes GCEPD [Feature:StorageProvider] should test that deleting a PVC before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach [Skipped:NoOptionalCapabilities] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-storage] Multi-AZ Cluster Volumes should schedule pods in the same zones as statically provisioned PVs [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

Example: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.17-upgrade-from-stable-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade/1794855545467834368