https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-router-551-ci-4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1752661032133726208

The funky job renaming done in these is breaking risk analysis. The disruption checking actually ran if you look in the logs, but we don't get far enough to generate the html template, I suspect because of the error returned by risk analysis.

Would be nice if both would work but I'd be happy just to get the disruption portion populated for now. I don't think the overall risk analysis will be easy.