Uploaded image for project: 'OCP Technical Release Team'
  1. OCP Technical Release Team
  2. TRT-1416

component readiness: distinguish missing job and missing test

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • False
    • None
    • False

      Suggestion for sippy component readiness. I am debugging why our boxes are light-green and it would help me a lot if "Test Details Report" was able to distinguish two cases:

       

      • new (4.15) job exists, but does not contain the test, like periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-X.X-e2e-aws-ovn here misses test "read-write-once-pod should block a second pod from using an in-use ReadWriteOncePod volume" in 4.15 (the test has been renamed upstream and I need to update test matching)
      • new (4.15) job does not exist at all, like periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-X.X-e2e-aws-crun-wasm on the same page 4.14. job exists4.15 does not

      UX idea: a new field "Job runs: XYZ" in "Sample Info" would tell me that a job has nozero runs, but test has 0 successes and 0 failures, i.e. a test is missing. And the "Job runs" could be clickable and lead to the full job history, regardless if it contained the test or not...

            Unassigned Unassigned
            rhn-engineering-jsafrane Jan Safranek
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: