Uploaded image for project: 'Distributed Tracing'
  1. Distributed Tracing
  2. TRACING-6062

jaeger-grpc port seems to be closed in Tempo 0.20

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • Tempo
    • None
    • 2
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Tracing Sprint # 285

      jaeger-grpc port seems to be closed in Tempo 0.20, but the service is available in port 16685 as well:

      name: jaeger-query ports:
      - containerPort: 16685
      - name: jaeger-grpc protocol: TCP - containerPort: 16686
      - name: jaeger-ui protocol: TCP - containerPort: 16687
      - name: jaeger-metrics protocol: TCP

      From a pod in the same namespace:

      / # nc -zv tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system 16686
      tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system (172.30.14.34:16686) open
      / # nc -zv tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system 16685
      nc: tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system (172.30.14.34:16685): Operation timed out

      In version 0.19:

      / # nc -zv tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system 16686
      tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system (172.30.82.188:16686) open
      / # nc -zv tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system 16685
      tempo-sample-query-frontend.tracing-system (172.30.82.188:16685) open

      We detected as our testing pipeline is using the grpc port, logs from Kiali:

      
      Could not fetch traces.
      GetAppTraces, Jaeger GRPC client error: rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing: dial tcp 172.30.14.34:16685: i/o timeout"
      

      We also set the example config in the docs using grpc, so the change could impact some customers (Ref. https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.16/html/service_mesh/service-mesh-2-x#ossm-configuring-distr-tracing-tempo_observability

              agerstma@redhat.com Andreas Gerstmayr
              rh-ee-jcordoba Josune Cordoba Torrecilla
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: