Uploaded image for project: 'Subscription Watch'
  1. Subscription Watch
  2. SWATCH-2333

When filtering by "RHEL for x86 HA", there are no hypervisors entries

XMLWordPrintable

    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • True
    • 5

      Hello all,

      When filtering by "RHEL for x86 HA", there are no hypervisors entries

      Environment:

      https://console.redhat.com/subscriptions/usage/

       

      SPECIFICS: - At

      https://console.redhat.com/subscriptions/usage/rhel
      :

      Subscription Usage > RHEL > select "RHEL for x86 HA" in "variants" > "Current Instances" shows only Virtual machine but not virt-who machines(ESX host at VMware).

      When Simple Content Access was disabled, Cu was able to see what kind of virt-who machine got attached the HA subscriptions.

      It had very useful information because they purchased the below subscriptions depending on how many virt-who machines need these subscriptions.
      1. High Availability for Unlimited Guests
      2. High Availability for Unlimited Guests (Disaster Recovery)

      • "CPU socket usage" says:

      ~~~~~~~~~~
      Subscription threshold 124
      Virtual 1619
      ~~~~~~~~~~

      The Cu doesn't feel this figure is correct.
      As long as virt-who machine (ESX host at VMware) attached "High Availability for Unlimited Guests*" subscriptions then virtual machine running on that virt-who machine is entitled.
      Does "CPU socket usage" not apply this rule??

      RESEARCH:
      =========

      • Confirmed if the Cu was using Satellite to entitle VM's and access HA repos. //USING SATELLITE
      • Automatic Inventory Upload is enabled.
         

      Friends, is that supposed to be presenting the hypervisors? once there is this concept of HA assigned to the hypervisors?

      Note that virt-who is also pulling/pushing the information.

              rhn-engineering-wpoteat William Poteat
              rhn-support-wpinheir Waldirio Pinheiro
              Diego de Oliveira Maranhao Diego de Oliveira Maranhao
              Votes:
              4 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: