-
Epic
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
[Upstream Cycle] Report when a PVC was last used
-
To Do
-
Future Sustainability
-
False
-
-
False
-
Not Selected
-
None
-
None
-
None
Epic Goal*
What is our purpose in implementing this? What new capability will be available to customers?
Report timestamp of PVC last attachment/mount by a pod.
Start work upstream with a KEP / Design accepted and work toward alpha status
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/5541
Why is this important? (mandatory)
What are the benefits to the customer or Red Hat? Does it improve security, performance, supportability, etc? Why is work a priority?
This will help our customers in their OCP storage management and costs reduction.
Scenarios (mandatory)
Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.
- As a admin or user I want to know when was the last time a PVC was used i.e mounted to a pod (or VM for OCP-V)
- As a system admin I want a report that will show me unused PVCs that were not mounted, used and owned by anyone, so that I can decide if I want to delete it and free up storage space (end use case, this should be achievable with a prometheus query or a dashboard)
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)
What items must be delivered by other teams/groups to enable delivery of this epic.
Add a new field in pvc.Status
Usual alpha, beta, GA graduation
Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory)
Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.
- Development - STOR
- Documentation - STOR
- QE - STOR
- PX -
- Others -
Acceptance Criteria (optional)
Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.
We should see a timestamp of the last attachement / used time in pvc.Status
Drawbacks or Risk (optional)
Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.
Done - Checklist (mandatory)
The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.
- CI Testing - Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
- Documentation - Content development is complete.
- QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
- Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
- Engineering Stories Merged
- All associated work items with the Epic are closed
- Epic status should be “Release Pending”