Epic Goal*

What is our purpose in implementing this?  What new capability will be available to customers?

When LSO are using device name, export to the OCP console as an alert warning.

Source - RFE-8389

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

What are the benefits to the customer or Red Hat?   Does it improve security, performance, supportability, etc?  Why is work a priority?

We've seen a lot of case where users are provisioning volumes with device names. by-id can fail and failback to device name e.g with vsphere where ids are not populated if disk.EnableUUID = “TRUE” is not set to yes.

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

1. As a user provisioning volumes via LSO, i want to be warned if they are consumed with by-names instead of by-id
2. As a support engineer i want to proactively reduce cases on the aforementioned issue

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

What items must be delivered by other teams/groups to enable delivery of this epic. 

Find a way to detect that volumes are using by-name (logs?) and raise a warning

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

• Development - STOR
• Documentation - N/A
• QE - STOR
• PX - 
• Others -

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.  

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

• CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
• Documentation - Content development is complete.
• QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
• Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
• Engineering Stories Merged
• All associated work items with the Epic are closed
• Epic status should be “Release Pending”