Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Storage'
  1. OpenShift Storage
  2. STOR-2340

Network Policies for Cluster Storage Operator

XMLWordPrintable

    • Network Policies for Storage operators in CSO
    • Product / Portfolio Work
    • OCPSTRAT-1978[Storage] Network Policies for Storage operators in CSO
    • 0% To Do, 17% In Progress, 83% Done
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Green
    • None
    • 3

      Epic Goal*

      What is our purpose in implementing this?  What new capability will be available to customers?

      Implement network policies for cluster storage operator (CSO) and all operator / pods running in openshift-cluster-storage-operator namespace. This is a requirement to do the same in the different storage operator that are managed by CSO. As part of this epic, write the actual NetworkPolicies that may be used by subsequent epics (CSI driver operators managed by OLM etc).

       
      Why is this important? (mandatory)

      What are the benefits to the customer or Red Hat?   Does it improve security, performance, supportability, etc?  Why is work a priority?

      Product level security priority as defined in OCPSTRAT-819

      All operators shipped as part of OCP should implement network policies by 4.20

       
      Scenarios (mandatory) 

      Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

      1.  

       
      Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

      What items must be delivered by other teams/groups to enable delivery of this epic. 

      Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

      Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

      • Development - STOR
      • Documentation -
      • QE - 
      • PX - 
      • Others -

      Acceptance Criteria (optional)

      Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.  

      Define the required network flows needed by the storage operators and implemented the appropriate network policy to limit traffic accordingly.

      Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

      Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.

      Done - Checklist (mandatory)

      The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

      • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
      • Documentation - Content development is complete.
      • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
      • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
      • Engineering Stories Merged
      • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
      • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 

              jdobson@redhat.com Jonathan Dobson
              rh-gs-gcharot Gregory Charot
              None
              Chao Yang
              Maxim Patlasov Maxim Patlasov
              Rohit Patil Rohit Patil
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 2 weeks
                  2w
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
                  0m
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 2 weeks
                  2w