Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Storage'
  1. OpenShift Storage
  2. STOR-1823

Remove Shared Resource CSI Driver Feature

XMLWordPrintable

    • Remove Shared Resource CSI Driver Feature
    • BU Product Work
    • 2
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Green
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-201 - Enable sharing ConfigMaps and Secrets across namespaces [GA]
    • OCPSTRAT-201Enable sharing ConfigMaps and Secrets across namespaces [GA]
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done

      Epic Goal*

      Remove the Shared Resource CSI Driver as a tech preview feature.
       
      Why is this important? (mandatory)

      Shared Resources was originally introduced as a tech preview feature in OpenShift Container Platform. After extensive review, we have decided to GA this component through the Builds for OpenShift layered product.

      Expected GA will be alongside OpenShift 4.16. Therefore it is safe to remove in OpenShift 4.17

       
      Scenarios (mandatory)

      1. Accessing RHEL content in builds/workloads
      2. Sharing other information across namespaces in the cluster (ex: OpenShift pull secret) 

       
      Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

      • BUILD-793

      Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

      Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

      • Development - OpenShift Storage, OpenShift Builds (#forum-openshift-builds)
      • Documentation -
      • QE - 
      • PX - 
      • Others -

      Acceptance Criteria (optional)

      • Shared Resource CSI driver cannot be installed using OCP feature gates/tech preview feature set.

      Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

      • Using Shared Resources requires installation of a layered product, not part of OCP core.

      Done - Checklist (mandatory)

      The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

      • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
      • Documentation - Content development is complete.
      • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
      • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
      • Engineering Stories Merged
      • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
      • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 

              jdobson@redhat.com Jonathan Dobson
              adkaplan@redhat.com Adam Kaplan
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 2 weeks
                  2w
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
                  0m
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 2 weeks
                  2w