Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift SDN'
  1. OpenShift SDN
  2. SDN-4220

Support hostname change in ovnk: network-operator should be regenetate multus and ovnk certs with new hostname name

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • OVN Kubernetes
    • Support hostname change in ovnk
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Hostname change doesn't require manual intervention for ovnk to start
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • ---
    • 0
    • 0

      Template:

      Networking Definition of Planned

      Epic Template descriptions and documentation

      Epic Goal

      As part of image-based upgrade we need to change hostname.

      Currently there two certificates that have hostname in it's CN, multus and ovnk.

      As part of this epic we want network-operator to handle hostname change by regenerating those certs with new CN

      Why is this important?

      in order to handle hostname change without manual intervention that requires removing multus and ovnk cert folders and restarting network-operator

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.

      ...

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1.

      ...

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. …

      Open questions::

      1. …

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              Unassigned Unassigned
              itsoiref@redhat.com Igal Tsoiref
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: