Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift SDN'
  1. OpenShift SDN
  2. SDN-2958

failure in test case "[sig-scheduling][Early] The openshift-etcd pods should be scheduled on different nodes"

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Normal
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • SDN Sprint 219
    • 0
    • 0

    Description

      job link

      must-gather

      log snippet from e2e log:

      [It] should be scheduled on different nodes [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
        github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/scheduling/pods.go:150
      Apr 11 06:38:49.338: FAIL: ns/openshift-etcd pod etcd-quorum-guard-7cbbc8db97-d9bv8 and pod etcd-quorum-guard-7cbbc8db97-5pfvx are running on the same node: ip-10-0-183-222.us-east-2.compute.internal
      
      Full Stack Trace
      github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/scheduling.glob..func1.7.1()
      	github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/scheduling/pods.go:151 +0x35
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).runSync(0xc0000001a0)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113 +0xba
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).run(0xc001dfeea0)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:64 +0x125
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*ItNode).Run(0x7fd0f2737fff)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/it_node.go:26 +0x7b
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).runSample(0xc0023d4000, 0xc002f25268, {0x8c66ca0, 0xc000426bc0})
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:215 +0x2a9
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).Run(0xc0023d4000, {0x8c66ca0, 0xc000426bc0})
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:138 +0xe7
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpec(0xc00219ef00, 0xc0023d4000)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:200 +0xe5
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpecs(0xc00219ef00)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:170 +0x1a5
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).Run(0xc00219ef00)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:66 +0xc5
      github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/suite.(*Suite).Run(0xc000438000, {0x8c66fc0, 0xc001f1e2d0}, {0x0, 0xc00009b800}, {0xc000a24e60, 0x1, 0x1}, {0x8d7c238, 0xc000426bc0}, ...)
      	github.com/onsi/ginkgo@v4.7.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/suite/suite.go:62 +0x4b2
      github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001297d10, {0xc000d01b90, 0xc632810, 0x4882100})
      	github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:61 +0x3be
      main.newRunTestCommand.func1.1()
      	github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:434 +0x32
      github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util.WithCleanup(0xc00193fc18)
      	github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/test.go:168 +0xad
      main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc0012c1680, {0xc000d01b90, 0x1, 0x1})
      	github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:434 +0x349
      github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc0012c1680, {0xc000d01ab0, 0x1, 0x1})
      	github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.2.1/command.go:856 +0x60e
      github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc0012c0c80)
      	github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.2.1/command.go:974 +0x3bc
      github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
      	github.com/spf13/cobra@v1.2.1/command.go:902
      main.main.func1(0xc000548700)
      	github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:84 +0x8a
      main.main()
      	github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:85 +0x3b6
      [AfterEach] [sig-scheduling][Early]
        github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:149
      STEP: Collecting events from namespace "e2e-test-scheduling-pod-check-vs65b".
      STEP: Found 0 events.
      Apr 11 06:38:49.403: INFO: POD  NODE  PHASE  GRACE  CONDITIONS
      Apr 11 06:38:49.403: INFO: 
      Apr 11 06:38:49.468: INFO: skipping dumping cluster info - cluster too large
      Apr 11 06:38:49.504: INFO: Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users  e2e-test-scheduling-pod-check-vs65b-user}, err: <nil>
      Apr 11 06:38:49.557: INFO: Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients  e2e-client-e2e-test-scheduling-pod-check-vs65b}, err: <nil>
      Apr 11 06:38:49.595: INFO: Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens  sha256~7kAKiyMDgK-N-46dal_2qUBK8_P9y0rLHSxDIF0rnko}, err: <nil>
      [AfterEach] [sig-scheduling][Early]
        github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/client.go:150
      STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-scheduling-pod-check-vs65b" for this suite.
      fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/scheduling/pods.go:151]: Apr 11 06:38:49.338: ns/openshift-etcd pod etcd-quorum-guard-7cbbc8db97-d9bv8 and pod etcd-quorum-guard-7cbbc8db97-5pfvx are running on the same node: ip-10-0-183-222.us-east-2.compute.internal
      
      failed: (4s) 2022-04-11T06:38:49 "[sig-scheduling][Early] The openshift-etcd pods should be scheduled on different nodes [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
      
      

      link to this job's testgrid for reference.

       

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            akaris@redhat.com Andreas Karis
            jluhrsen Jamo Luhrsen
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: