-
Bug
-
Resolution: Not a Bug
-
Minor
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
-
USER PROBLEM
What is the user experiencing as a result of the bug? Include steps to reproduce.
- IHAC enabled OOTB ACS policy “ADD Command used instead of COPY.” In the environment, the application uses a Red Hat UBI image in the Dockerfile. They have no “ADD” line in their Dockerfile. However, they are getting violations from this deployment. I reproduced the behavior in my environment. I also checked the UBI container file, and it does not include any “ADD” in it. Can someone explain why such a violation?
I have a case open (https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/04257923).
CONDITIONS
What conditions need to exist for a user to be affected? Is it everyone? Is it only those with a specific integration? Is it specific to someone with particular database content? etc.
- I reviewed a few use cases from quay.io and was unable to reproduce this issue. I'll be deploying this UBI image to my environment soon and will update the ticket.
ROOT CAUSE
What is the root cause of the bug?
- pending
FIX
How was the bug fixed (this is more important if a workaround was implemented rather than an actual fix)?
- pending