We'd like to utilize a new feature for gathering must-gather info.
Instead of adding each image to the `oc adm must-gather` cli we'd like to use the new `--all-images` flag.
In order for that flag to work an annotation needs to be added to each of our operators.

*For more context I'm attaching the content of the mail we received about that below:
*

Hello Dragonfly team,

I'm reaching out on this address since it's mentioned as maintainer for these
must-gather images [0]. I work on the OpenShift Virtualization team and we
recently added a feature to `oc` CLI tool's `oc adm must-gather` command.

Currently, `oc adm must-gather --image <image-1> --image <image-2>` helps
collect must-gather using the plugin images passed as CLI arguments. In the
last quarter we proposed [1] and added [2] the `--all-images` flag to this
command that checks the OCP cluster for Operators annotated with
`operators.openshift.io/must-gather-image`. E.g. the CNV Operator would be
annotated as below:

```
operators.openshift.io/must-gather-image: registry.redhat.io/container-native-virtualization/cnv-must-gather-rhel9:<image-digest>
```

When Operators are annotated this way, using `oc adm must-gather --all-images`
will collect a must-gather for all plugin images using their default command.
Benefits of using this command:

1. Single `-all-images` flag instead of multiple `-image` flags.
2. If more Operators deployed on OCP use this annotation, it could help reduce
back and forth between the technical support & customers.
3. It could help in scenario where customers can't collect multiple
must-gathers, e.g., disconnected/remote OCP clusters.

More info on this epic [3].

Would you be willing to opt-in to this mechanism so our support folks have it
easier to work on customer cases? We'd be more than happy to help in any way
needed.

[0] https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/search?gs&q=workload-availability%20must-gather
[1] https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1487
[2] https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1633
[3] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-29411

Regards,
Dharmit