Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Process Automation Manager'
  1. Red Hat Process Automation Manager
  2. RHPAM-736

Change label of Retries field to Retries remaining or Retries left for better understanding

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Minor
    • 7.0.0.GA
    • 7.0.0.GA
    • Business Central
    • None
    • ER2
    • ER5
    • Hide

      1. Create a process with async Script Task which consists of throw new Exception("Exception was thrown by purpose!");
      2. Go to Job Request Details, find the job and open its details.
      3. You will see Retries 0 and Executions 4 which means there was 1 normal execution + 3 retries. See Retries0.png attachment.

      According to Maciej this is OK, so can we at least make the field description to be Retries remaining or Retries left?

      Show
      1. Create a process with async Script Task which consists of throw new Exception("Exception was thrown by purpose!"); 2. Go to Job Request Details, find the job and open its details. 3. You will see Retries 0 and Executions 4 which means there was 1 normal execution + 3 retries. See Retries0.png attachment. According to Maciej this is OK, so can we at least make the field description to be Retries remaining or Retries left ?
    • 2018 Week 15-16, 2018 Week 17-18

    Description

      When I create a process with async Script Task which consists of throw new Exception("Exception was thrown by purpose!"); I can see Retries 0 and Executions 4 which means there was 1 normal execution + 3 retries. See Retries0.png attachment.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              nmirasch@redhat.com Neus Miras Chueca
              mmacik@redhat.com Marian Macik
              Bojan Sremac Bojan Sremac (Inactive)
              Bojan Sremac Bojan Sremac (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: