Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Process Automation Manager'
  1. Red Hat Process Automation Manager
  2. RHPAM-446

Stunner - Morphing & rule evaluations issues

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Minor
    • 7.2.0.GA
    • 7.0.0.GA
    • jBPM Designer
    • Hide

      Consider the following scenario:

      • Two nodes A and B, which are being connected by an edge E
      • B can morph into C
      • E allows connections between A-B, but does NOT allow A-C
        So the current diagram looks like:
        [A] --(E)--> [B]
        

        At this point, once clicking on B, it's morph menu appears (bottom), and the user is able to morph it into C, which results in an invalid state, as the connection A to C it not allowed

      Show
      Consider the following scenario: Two nodes A and B, which are being connected by an edge E B can morph into C E allows connections between A-B, but does NOT allow A-C So the current diagram looks like: [A] --(E)--> [B] At this point, once clicking on B, it's morph menu appears (bottom), and the user is able to morph it into C, which results in an invalid state, as the connection A to C it not allowed

    Description

      It's allowed to morph nodes into different types, but it could result in some invalid diagram state. At least it has been reproduced by producing an invalid connection context, see steps to reproduce.

      It implies checks/fixes for:

      • The contextual morph menu(bottom() - It should be just displaying the allowed target types for the actual diagram state, making this way not possible to end up in some rule evaluation failed
      • Morphing (core) commands -> check/fix the actual implementations - those should checking all available rule contexts before execution

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              tdolphin-1 Tiago Dolphine
              kgaevski@redhat.com Kirill Gaevskii
              Lubomir Terifaj Lubomir Terifaj
              Lubomir Terifaj Lubomir Terifaj
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: