-
Feature
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Critical
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
-
Not Selected
-
False
-
False
-
-
-
0
-
0
*Feature Overview
How much can we upstream into leapp so that the RHEL upgrade is ‘normal’ with no special caveats?
What do we need to do to get our packages/repositories into the leapp repomap, etc?
Wrap or don’t wrap leapp in edpm-ansible playbooks.
If we do, we should collaborate with RHEL rather than roll our own. See RHELBU-3269 Create a System Role for Upgrades (scheduled for release in RHEL 9.8 GA)
Cater for any EDPM host, including Networker, Storage (Ceph/Swift), Compute
How do we feel about allowing customers to co-ordinate system upgrades via external tools (Satellite, AAP, gitlab, jenkins), rather than forcing our own methods?
TODO need feedback from PM about UX and requirements
Ansible roles compatibility in RHEL9 and RHEL10 (different versions of ansible, python, libs)
*Goals
<your text here>
Requirements (mandatory -_ Complete while in Refinement status):
A list of specific needs, capabilities, or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the Feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.
| Requirement | Notes | isMVP? |
|---|---|---|
Done - Acceptance Criteria (mandatory - Complete while in Refinement status):
Acceptance Criteria articulates and defines the value proposition - what is required to meet the goal and intent of this Feature. The Acceptance Criteria provides a detailed definition of scope and the expected outcomes - from a users point of view
…
<your text here>
Use Cases - i.e. User Experience & Workflow: (Initial completion while in Refinement status):
Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios.
<your text here>
Out of Scope _ _(Initial completion while in Refinement status):
High-level list of items or persona’s that are out of scope.
<your text here>
Documentation Considerations _ _(Initial completion while in Refinement status):
Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs. If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation..
<your text here>
Questions to Answer _ _(Initial completion while in Refinement status):
Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin.
<your text here>
Background and Strategic Fit (Initial completion while in Refinement status):
Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature.
<your text here>
Customer Considerations _ _(Initial completion while in Refinement status):
Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.
<your text here>
Team Sign Off (Completion while in Planning status)
- All required Epics (known at the time) are linked to the this Feature
- All required Stories, Tasks (known at the time) for the most immediate Epics have been created and estimated
- Add - Reviewers name, Team Name
- Acceptance == Feature as “Ready” - well understood and scope is clear - Acceptance Criteria (scope) is elaborated, well defined, and understood
- Note: Only set FixVersion/s: on a Feature if the delivery team agrees they have the capacity and have committed that capability for that milestone
| Reviewed By | Team Name | Accepted | Notes |
- …
- account is impacted by
-
OSPRH-27156 RHEL system upgrade
-
- Closed
-