Uploaded image for project: 'OpenStack Strategy'
  1. OpenStack Strategy
  2. RHOSSTRAT-1040

Support Ceph 9 Release in RHOSO-18 (Ceph Storage)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Feature
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Major Major
    • rhos-18.0.17 FR 5
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Not Selected
    • False
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0% To Do, 50% In Progress, 50% Done

      Description

      Testing and any documentation to enable RHOSO support for the Ceph-9 release (RHCS9) as an external ceph cluster to enable customers on the latest RHCS major release.

      Goals:

      • Produce Internal doc on the process for bumping major release version
      • Update upstream/pre-testing to validate ceph9
        • upstream: change upstream operator CI, and devstack-plugin-ceph to upstream T (aka ceph 9)
        • downstream: change at least 1 job to use ceph 9
      • Provide any required RHOSO documentation for RHCS9 support

      Documentation Considerations

      • We may have known limitations (needs downstream ceph ga bits first and verify state), but we may need to allow support without Manila/CephFS initially
      • Need to confirm there are not other needs for RHOSO documentation with RCHS9 and that it doesn't impact existing coverage of Ceph configuration or features like adoption.
      • Greenfield support note
      • RGW + TLS notes
      • Ganesha limitation (possible)

      Accept Criteria

      • Enable Official support for RHCS-9
      • MVP is RBD block support
      • Upstream and downstream test coverage is sufficient for regression coverage with the new release

      Testing considerations:

      • Current testing matrix integration:
        • rhoso 18 greenfield: gamma 7, delta (ganesha+rgw) 8, epsilon (cinder) 7
        • rhoso 18 adoption: gamma 7
      • Component level : cinder+glance at 7
      • considerations:
        • bump delta to 9
        • gamma greenfield to 8
        • epsilon greenfield to 8
        •  

      Open Questions

      • If Manila or RGW not ready, do we release like last time with what's ready and follow up?
        • Yes - would need to create a seperate initiative to cover as needed
      • Do we have any dependencies on the Production RA for CI or ceph client changes?
        • No, we keep client at 7 and we plan the update to 9 for 19
      • Do we need a support enablement EPIC for RHCS9 specifically?
      • Do we want to make the DOC epic more generic and capture any future needs there too?
        • we can make the doc epic more generic and have stories for RGW, known issues and potential limitations

              gfidente-rh Giulio Fidente
              pgrist@redhat.com Paul Grist
              Gregory Charot Gregory Charot
              rhos-storage-integration
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: