Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Internal Developer Platform'
  1. Red Hat Internal Developer Platform
  2. RHIDP-9963

leverage model-catalog-template test libraries in CLI/Bridge

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • model-registry-bridge

      Story (Required)

      As a AI platform engineer trying to inject AI model catalog information into RHDH I want the catalog-info.yaml produced from the CLI and Bridge to go under model-catalog-template validation

       

      Background (Required)

      During review of https://github.com/redhat-ai-dev/model-catalog-template/pull/2 johnmcollier and gmontero@redhat.com agreed that long term it would be great if that test framework in that repo could be structured in such a way that the parts that could be reused by other repositories that produced catalog-info.yaml output, where the validated the model catalog reqs against the data they produced.

       

      We are opening this placeholder for this, where we will officially refine oncel model-catalog-templates is structured and ready for such reuse.

      Out of scope

       

      Approach (Required)

      For now, we are waiting  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDHPAI-538  is one and a clear recipe is in place for reusing the test framework in model-catalog-template

      Dependencies

        https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDHPAI-538  

      Use of git submodules or npm to get the model-catalog-template framework as a dependency should be determined

      Acceptance Criteria (Required)

      For now, we are waiting  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDHPAI-538  is one and a clear recipe is in place for reusing the test framework in model-catalog-template

      documentation updates (design docs, release notes etc)
      demo needed
      SOP required
      education module update (Filled by RHDHPAI team only)
      R&D label required (Filled by RHDHPAI team only)

      Done Checklist

      Code is completed, reviewed, documented and checked in
      Unit and integration test automation have been delivered and running cleanly in continuous integration/staging/canary environment
      Continuous Delivery pipeline(s) is able to proceed with new code included
      Customer facing documentation, API docs, design docs etc. are produced/updated, reviewed and published
      Acceptance criteria are met
      If the Grafana dashboard is updated, ensure the corresponding SOP is updated as well

              Unassigned Unassigned
              gmontero@redhat.com Gabe Montero
              RHIDP - AI
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: