Uploaded image for project: 'Red Hat Internal Developer Platform'
  1. Red Hat Internal Developer Platform
  2. RHIDP-10070

Investigate directly pointing to AI sample repositories for software templates (main branch only)

    • 5
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False

      Story (Required)

       

      Background (Required)

      Currently, we store copies of any sample applications that we use in the software templates in https://github.com/redhat-ai-dev/ai-lab-samples/ which then get pulled into software templates via generate.sh (and copied once more).

      We recently discussed maintenance for the various AI software template repositories (ai-lab-app, ai-lab-samples, and ai-lab-template), and decided that for the main branch of the software template, it would be fine to directly reference the Git repositories that the samples come from (e.g. https://github.com/containers/ai-lab-recipes/tree/main/recipes/natural_language_processing/chatbot), as we do not currently make any modifications to them.

      However, this change is restricted to just the main branch, for releases of the software template, they will point to a fixed copy of the sample(s). So the release process (see DEVHAS-710) should cover updating the templates to reference a local copy.

      Out of scope

      Approach (Required)

      Dependencies

      <Describes what this story depends on. Dependent Stories and EPICs should be linked to the story.>

      Acceptance Criteria (Required)

      <Describe edge cases to consider when implementing the story and defining tests>

      <Provides a required and minimum list of acceptance tests for this story. More is expected as the engineer implements this story>

      documentation updates (design docs, release notes etc)
      demo needed
      SOP required
      education module update (Filled by DEVHAS team only)
      R&D label required (Filled by DEVHAS team only)

      Done Checklist

      Code is completed, reviewed, documented and checked in
      Unit and integration test automation have been delivered and running cleanly in continuous integration/staging/canary environment
      Continuous Delivery pipeline(s) is able to proceed with new code included
      Customer facing documentation, API docs, design docs etc. are produced/updated, reviewed and published
      Acceptance criteria are met
      If the Grafana dashboard is updated, ensure the corresponding SOP is updated as well

              Unassigned Unassigned
              johnmcollier John Collier
              RHIDP - AI
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: