This issue was originally created at 2024-03-19T08:44:56.643Z as a Gitlab issue:
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/tests/kernel/kernel-tests/-/issues/1884

1. Snippet of test failure

>>> 1045:set_mempolicy04__with_dmesg_entry FAIL <<<
###############################################################################

1. Test Num : 1045 #
2. Test Case : set_mempolicy04__with_dmesg_entry #
3. Test Result : FAIL #
   ###############################################################################

1 <<<test_start>>>
2 tag=set_mempolicy04__with_dmesg_entry stime=1710785821
3 cmdline="dmesg -c 1>/dev/null 2>&1; set_mempolicy04; EXIT_CODE=$?; dmesg > /mnt/testarea/ltp/output/DMESG_DIR_RHELKT1LITE.FILTERED-dmesg-output-50712-01:52:34PM/set_mempolicy04.dmesg.log; exit $EXIT_CODE"
4 contacts=""
5 analysis=exit
6 <<<test_output>>>
7 tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
8 tst_test.c:1709: TINFO: LTP version: 20240129
9 tst_test.c:1593: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
10 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2
11 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist
12 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3
13 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist
14 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4
15 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist
16 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs
17 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does exist
18 tst_supported_fs_types.c:104: TINFO: Skipping bcachefs because of FUSE blacklist
19 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat
20 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
21 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports exfat
22 tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.exfat does exist
23 tst_supported_fs_types.c:127: TINFO: Filesystem ntfs is not supported
24 tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports tmpfs
25 tst_supported_fs_types.c:48: TINFO: mkfs is not needed for tmpfs
26 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 ===
27 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
28 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
29 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 587, expected <546.17,583.83>
30 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 543, expected <546.17,583.83>
31 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
32 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 ===
33 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
34 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
35 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 530, expected <546.17,583.83>
36 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 600, expected <546.17,583.83>
37 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
38 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 ===
39 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
40 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
41 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 587, expected <546.17,583.83>
42 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 543, expected <546.17,583.83>
43 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
44 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on xfs ===
45 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
46 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
47 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 530, expected <546.17,583.83>
48 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 600, expected <546.17,583.83>
49 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
50 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
51 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
52 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
53 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 530, expected <546.17,583.83>
54 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 600, expected <546.17,583.83>
55 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
56 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on exfat ===
57 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
58 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
59 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 530, expected <546.17,583.83>
60 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 600, expected <546.17,583.83>
61 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
62 tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on tmpfs ===
63 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
64 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
65 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 530, expected <546.17,583.83>
66 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 1 allocated 600, expected <546.17,583.83>
67 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (1130)
68
69 Summary:
70 passed 14
71 failed 14
72 broken 0
73 skipped 0
74 warnings 0
75 <<<execution_status>>>
76 initiation_status="ok"
77 duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
78 cutime=5 cstime=8
79 <<<test_end>>>

1. Test logs

https://s3.upshift.redhat.com/DH-PROD-CKI/internal-artifacts/1217939678/test_aarch64/6419064880/artifacts/run.done.01/job.01/index.html

1. DataWarehouse issue

https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/issue/2594

**In case opening the links above result in a 404 page on DataWarehouse, please
make sure you are [correctly logged into DataWarehouse via Red Hat SSO](
https://cki-project.org/l/datawarehouse-404).**