-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
9.x
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
False
-
-
None
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
-
None
-
None
-
Unspecified
-
Unspecified
-
Unspecified
Section number and name: 4.5.4. An example SPEC file for a program written in Python
Describe the issue: In the example spec file of the "An example spec file for the pello program written in Python" subsection the package license is specified as the MIT license:
License: MIT
However, the LICENSE file created for this package in the 3.2. Creating a LICENSE file section specifies GPLv3, creating unnecessary inconsistency.
Impact of this issue: Documentation consumers will be unnecessarily confused by the inconsistent license declaration.
Suggestions for improvement: Change the value of the License field of the spec file as GPLv3 as well.