-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Undefined
-
rhel-9.7
-
ansible-freeipa-1.15.0-1.el9
-
No
-
Moderate
-
rhel-idm-zta
-
ssg_idm
-
21
-
23
-
5
-
QE ack, Dev ack
-
False
-
False
-
-
Yes
-
None
-
Pass
-
New Test Coverage
-
Enhancement
-
Unspecified
-
Unspecified
-
Unspecified
-
None
It was observed earlier (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-2829) that the RHEL system roles can be installed both as RHEL RPM or from Red Hat Automation Hub (RH AH) and a playbook will work in both cases using FQCNs such as redhat.rhel_system_roles.timesync.
However, the ansible-freeipa does not currently allow for this, but it would seem with some newly added sym links this might be doable, unless some show-stoppers are found during testing.
From packaging perspective, the 'redhat' directory ownership should not be an issue:
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat rhel-system-roles-1.88.9-0.1.el9_5.noarch ansible-pcp-2.3.0-1.el9.noarch
To allow proper testing the first step could be:
# mkdir -p /usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat # cd /usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat # ln -s ../freeipa/ansible_freeipa rhel_idm
Then, a playbook using e.g. redhat.rhel_idm.ipabackup should work the same regardless from where the collection was installed. Thhanks.
- clones
-
RHEL-89438 [RFE] [ansible-freeipa] Provide playbook compatibility in Ansible freeipa/idm RPM - RHEL-10.1
-
- Release Pending
-
- links to
-
RHBA-2025:149409 ansible-freeipa bug fix and enhancement update